Public Art

Grabbed this picture of aome public art at the Aurora (CO) municipal complex. This is actually one half of a sundial.

As nearly always, this is an Android shot edited in different ways using the Snapseed app.

Sunset on the Lake

Took the dSLR out to the lake today and grabbed some sunset shots. These are the Android pictures I took with my Note II and edited with Snapseed.

Hopefully sooner or later I'll get the pics off the Pentax and edit them for sharing too.

Surrey Ridge

I know I haven't posted too often recently, but I also haven't been taking too many pictures lately.

Oops. I've just been in a funk and not feeling artsy. I apologize.

These were taken yesterday near Surrey Ridge at the Douglas Co. open space dog park. The one image (and since I'm posting this mobile I have no idea which one it is) is grainy on purpose. I added grain to the image on purpose but might have overdone it a little.

What do you think?

[Edit: looks like it's the middle one]

A Walk With the Dogs

Here are a couple of shots from this morning's walk with the dogs over at Cherry Creek State Park. The day is overcast but not the greatest light especially considering I was shooting with my Note II (also the device I'm posting from).

I wanted to bring my dSLR and tripod but trying to hold on to two leashes while setting up equipment didn't sound like fun to me.

As always, these mobile shots were edited with Snapseed for Android.

Old Chevy

While out walking the dogs this morning I ran across this old Chevy truck. Well, not really a  truck so much as station wagon.  Since I've never seen it before I decided to go ahead and grab a couple Android shots while it was there.

I treated the picture and two separate ways both using Snapseed. One is basic black and white and the other I added a sepia style tint to give it an older feel.

No, I'm Not Required to Reciprocate

It's been a while since I made a post. Sorry. I wish I could say it wasn't my fault, but it was and there's no one to blame but myself. You see, my niece was in town for nearly two weeks and from wake-up until bed-time I remained busy, busy, busy. Also, I spent a lot of time in the mountains and various areas that received little to no internet connection.

Huh? What?

That means it was nearly impossible for me to upload photos or anything else via mobile connection.

But let's move on.

I was recently perusing Streamzoo on my Note II and noticed a lot of people, especially younger people, claiming they will follow back if you start following them. Great! Reciprocating is fun and respectful, right?

Well, maybe.

There's no rule that says we need to follow people back. In the days of messageboards and Facebook following someone was a two-way street, but with the advent of Twitter and other social networks, people are free to follow whom they choose to follow without having to have those others follow back.

Wait. What?

You don't have to follow people back. If you're trying to build your follower numbers, sure a little reciprocation seems like a good idea, but what if your content isn't any good? Do I, or should I feel obligated, to follow you back? What if I follow you because you're smart, witty, interesting, etc but I post content that you find distasteful or childish? Should you feel obligated to follow me back?

The answer is no.

Follow what you like. In the case of Streamzoo, you're only posting selfies of yourself in the bathroom, or pictures of flowers, or all your images are the most hideous forms of HDR, why on Earth should anyone follow your content?

If, on Twitter, you follow me because you like my pictures (by the way, I don't have a Twitter account for photography) but you only post status updates about the Kardashians and I don't care about the Kardashians, why on Earth should I follow you?

Again, there's no rule.

Newsfeeds and social networks allow us to create a sphere of incoming content around us we wish to see, no longer being forced to see what other people choose to push upon us. If I want to see content about dogs, I can follow content about dogs -- I no longer have to wade through a pile of BS hoping for that small bit about man's best friend. If I want to follow Israeli/Palesitnian politics, why should I feel obligated to follow someone who posts about making sandwiches for their child all day long?

The short answer is, no, I won't automatically reciprocate.  I will peruse your content and choose whether or not it adds value to my incoming feeds. If you're only posting macro images of flowers and I'm already following people who post macro images of flowers, how does your content improve my feed?

In the case of photography, I'm looking for technical inspiration or something that sparks an emotion or a fond memory. The 150 images you posted of your car's dashboard doesn't do that at all. The family photos of your cats aren't really adding value to my stream either.

If you're upset that no one's following you, it's time to change your content. Yes, you're pretty but obviously only 12 people think you're pretty enough to follow. Yes, you have a good eye for taking pictures of tennis balls, but people want to see more from you than tennis balls. Go crazy, post a picture of a racquetball! Yes, it looks like you know how to turn on HDR on your iPhone ... now turn it off. HDR is hideous.

Picture Unlreated, but this is a Photography Blog after all.

The DeLaney House

The DeLaney house is a museum made from one of the oldest still standing homesteads in Aurora, CO. Built in the 1870s the house was moved from its original location to its current spot neara the Aurora municipal building.

I went there yesterday with my niece and these are a couple of the Android shots I grabbed with my phone. As always, they were edited with Snapseed.

Yesterday at the Park

Just a few more Android shots. These are from yesterday at the local state park. The weather was overcast and chilly giving me some great texture in the sky. Once again I wish I would have brought my dSLR with me while out walking the dogs.

As you can see, I edited fairly liberally with the Snapseed app and gave a couple of the images a little old-timey feel.

This Afternoon

A couple of pics fron this afternoon's cloud cover. These were caught with my Android while out walking the dogs since I left the house without my dSLR.

There were a couple more but these are the ones I'm sharing. The others were selfies and trust me -- you really don't want to see that.

As always, edited with Snapseed.

Summer in the City

Grabbed this little gem with my Android while walking the dogs. This is a scene from a nearby park within the city limits, therefore summer in the city. ::smiles::

Edited on the go with Snapseed.

Rando -- Random Images from the World

It's been a month or so since I downloaded the Rando app from the Google Play Store. I read about it in a post on Google+ and decided to give it a try. It's a fun little app reminiscent of chatroulette, but so far, without all the penises.

The premise is simple: take a picture, upload it up to the internet aethyr and receive one in return. The names, no connections, no nothing. You take pictures. You send pictures. You receive pictures. That's all there is to Rando.

As they state on their Play page:

Description

Rando is an experimental photo exchange platform.

Give, receive and collect unique photos from random people from all over the world.

A rando must be sent for one to be received. It's about gifting rather than sharing.

You will never know who received the rando, they will never know who sent it.

You will know the location of where it landed, the receiver will know where in the world it was taken.

Build your rando collection with unique cultural sights from around the world.

We deliberately haven’t incorporated social features into the application.

No likes, no comments, no direct communication.

Just Rando.

And that's exactly what it does: Rando allows you to take an image with your cell phone (in this case Android) and send it off into the wind. Only other people with the Rando app will receive an image and only after sending an image themselves.

First Random Picture I Sent

For a month now I've been sending random images into the universe: pictures of the area where I live, what I'm eating, my dog, the leaves on the trees and anything I think others might want to see. Or might not want to see. Unfiltered, unedited and unknown, that's the beauty of Rando!

Let's be honest, when I first heard about Rando I thought it was something akin to Chatroulette and recipients would be receiving unwanted pictures of penis' and other items no one really wants to gaze upon while toodling around on their device.

Unlike the Instagram square that made all the hipster's pants wet, as you can see to the right, the images are all round, creating a new challenge to framing and capturing content. This also gives Rando it's own unique look, different than the four corners look of nearly every other image on the internet.

Using the app is as basic as you'd think. Without post-editing, watermarks, frames or filters you just launch the app, touch the round button at the bottom, the image is recorded and then uploaded to the aethyr.

Boom! You're done.

Well, sort of.

In the upper right hand corner of the Rando screen are a series of grey dots --  one atop the other -- each one corresponding to an image you took awaiting delivery somewhere in the world. As images come to you delivered randomly from the Rando-verse, red dots will build up at the top of your Rando stream awaiting delivery from a queue to your device. Simply swipe downwards and the images come in one-by-one, or rather, swipe-by-swipe.

Tapping on a delivered image flips the image showing a map of the image's point of origin. I've noticed not all images have locations and I'm not sure if that has to do with GPS not being turned on or some other setting that doesn't seem to exist.

That's right, Rando's settings are very limited -- as in, there are none.

For a while I thought I noticed Rando's coming in similar in construct to Randos I sent. For example, if I sent a picture of the sunset, I'd receive a picture of the sky. If I sent a picture with a face (mine or my dog's) then I'd receive a picture with a face. If I sent a car, or other large man-made item, I'd receive an image of a large man-made item. This doesn't always seem to be the case, though. However, it was noticeable and now I pay attention to how closely the images are in subject matter. If this is true and not me just seeing patterns were there are no patterns, it means there's an algorithm out there selecting pictures and the service isn't completely random at all.

I've also noticed, most of the images seem to be coming from South Korea and the eastern half of Europe. Very few are from the western hemisphere and I've seen absolutely none what-so-ever from the southern hemisphere. At least, not that I can recall. Maybe the app just hasn't caught on yet.

The Good -- Or, Why I Like Rando

Random. I like random. More importantly, Rando is a view into how other people see their own worlds. Sure, there are pictures of books on tables, cups of coffee, ashtrays and other completely random bits of the world.

Rando I sent earlier today

For example, yesterday I received an image of a pack of Marlboro cigarettes, but the package was written in Korean. The flip side of the image does, in fact, show the image originated in South Korea.

There are no watermarks, no post-processing and no userIDs. It's completely random. Like playing 5 card stud -- you play with the hand you're dealt. Since there are no watermarks there is no way to attach an URL or social media information aside from taking a picture of something with the URL or social media contact information. You cannot load a pre-existing image from your gallery to Rando, either. Point. Shoot. Send.

You have no choice in where the image is delivered. The Rando servers take care of the delivery duties by some sort of mathematical magic to which I'm not privy. Like I stated earlier, in order to send and receive the Randos, each user must have the app. There is no way to share the image to social media after receiving it or to save it to your device, but with a recent update, Rando now has a folder on your Android system to store your images. The only current method to save received images is by taking a screenshot while the image is prominent on your screen.

Maybe I'm different, but I like the randomness of not exactly curating a stream of photographers or styles.

The Bad -- Or, Things That Could Be Better

I have no idea why Rando insists on notifying me where my photos were sent. Unless there's a way to like the image or to communicate with the recipient, knowing where it went is pointless. Just knowing it's out there in the interverse is good enough, especially considering the whole purpose of Rando.

Being able to click the map and opening the corresponding Google Map would be a nice feature. Then the recipient could zoom into the location and learn more about where the image came from. Or, perhaps the corresponding search results/Wikipedia page for the location. Right now, I think the map would be easiest since a map screen shot is already shared.

Also, why the red dots and the having to pull the screen down to get new randos to show? I'd rather they just load, perhaps with a red dot next to them or with an outline of red (or whatever color) indicating they're new to my stream. Having to slide the screen down each time is cumbersome. Or if we must, can't a screen slide load all the images instead of one at a time? Maybe this is just a personal preference, but to me it seems more streamlined as a workflow.

For a while I thought it would be nice to edit images before sending them, even adding filters ala Instagram and it's clones, but then I recalled how I really like the raw unedited method of not being able to edit images. SOOC, or straight out of the camera, at it's finest. Kind of like going back to the most basic point and shoot film camera of our, well my, childhood. Knowing the image is WYSISYG really forces the photographer to pay attention to what s/he's doing since there is no option to "fix it in photoshop." From what I've received in my Rando stream, it appears most people aren't taking care to properly expose an image so I might be in the minority in this regard.

The Ugly -- Or, the Potential to Be Ugly

Since the images are completely random (I'm not sure if Rando keeps them and any identifying markers) there is always the potential for abuse. I'm not talking nudity or pornography, but rather pictures of abuse, pictures of a violent or child-pornographic nature, and anything else I can't think of at the moment.

The End

I like Rando. It's fun without hassle. It's the ultimate shoutout to the universe: this is my life! From a sociology perspective, you can see how other people live their lives as they choose to show you, and with the app's claims to randomness, there's no reason not to show the universe anything.

[I'm pretty sure there's something else I wanted to write, but for the life of me, I can't recall what it might have been. I'm sure it will come to me when I use the app later. Expect an update.]

Fun at the Park

Took Rufus and Charlie to the dog park for a little fun in the Colorado Sun. I didn't bring the dSLR and regretted it almost immediately as the dogs that were there were very photogenic.

The grass had some yellow flowers sprouting all over the place, so I tried to grab a couple of shots of the dogs in the green and yellow.

Below are some of those Android shots, edited with the Snapseed app.